Quote Originally Posted by Biggin View Post
I dont understand how using one definition of the beginning of human life that has a little scientific evidence is more hard to believe than a theory of the beginning of man that has no scientific basis whatsoever.

I have never said the Theory of Evolution is true, nor do I believe it to be 100% correct, but I do believe that there is more evidence support that theory than any other one.


How can God be explained through Science, or should he be? God is not familiar with time, he does not operate in time.I do not expect that Science will ever be able to explain God. Most do not even believe in him, so why would they attempt to explain something they do not believe exists?